Scientists Discover Mushrooms Invented Psychedelic Compound Twice—Completely Independently

Across cultures and centuries, humans have encountered mushrooms not just as food or poison, but as mysterious companions on the boundary between the natural and the spiritual. Among these, so-called “magic mushrooms” have held a special place for their ability to alter consciousness, provoke mystical experiences, and now, in the modern era, offer hope as a treatment for mental health conditions like depression. At the heart of these effects is a single molecule: psilocybin.

When ingested, psilocybin is transformed in the body into psilocin, a compound that interacts with serotonin receptors in the brain. The result is a temporary shift in perception, emotion, and awareness—a kind of biochemical doorway into altered states of consciousness. But while psilocybin has been studied for decades, a new discovery by a German-Austrian research team has revealed something extraordinary: nature has found not one, but two completely different ways to make this same molecule.

Two Paths to the Same Destination

The research, led by Friedrich Schiller University Jena and the Leibniz Institute for Natural Product Research and Infection Biology (Leibniz-HKI), has shown for the first time that mushrooms belonging to very different groups independently evolved the ability to produce psilocybin.

Species of the Psilocybe genus—the most famous magic mushrooms—use one well-documented set of enzymes to synthesize psilocybin. But the researchers discovered that mushrooms from a completely different genus, Inocybe, commonly called fiber caps, arrive at the same molecule through an entirely different route.

Two paths lead to the same molecule: Independently of each other, different genera of “magic mushrooms” have developed two different enzyme pathways that produce the same psychoactive substance, psilocybin—a rare example of convergent evolution in natural product biosynthesis. Credit: Tim Schäfer, Leibniz-HKI

It is as though nature set up two separate workshops, stocked them with completely different tools, and yet both managed to craft the exact same end product. This phenomenon is a striking example of convergent evolution, where unrelated organisms arrive at similar solutions to life’s challenges.

Why Would Nature Do This?

The most tantalizing question remains unanswered: why would two different groups of mushrooms, living in different habitats, go to such trouble to produce psilocybin?

Professor Dirk Hoffmeister, who led the study, acknowledges the mystery. “Nature does nothing without reason,” he explains. “There must be an advantage to both fiber cap mushrooms in the forest and Psilocybe species on manure or wood mulch producing this molecule—we just don’t know what it is yet.”

One hypothesis is that psilocybin acts as a kind of chemical defense mechanism. In Psilocybe mushrooms, injuries trigger a rapid reaction that breaks down psilocybin, leaving behind striking blue pigments. This sudden chemical transformation may serve as a warning signal to predators—or perhaps the compound itself deters animals, insects, or microbes from feeding on the mushrooms.

But there may be more subtle ecological functions at play, ones still hidden within the complex chemical conversations between fungi and their environments.

A Puzzle Unlocked Through Genomics

The discovery emerged from a careful search through fungal genomes. Tim Schäfer, the study’s lead author, described the process as “like looking at two different workshops, but both ultimately delivering the same product.”

By examining the genetic instructions for psilocybin synthesis, the researchers identified that fiber cap mushrooms employ a completely different set of enzymes than Psilocybe. To confirm their findings, they used protein modeling, carried out by chemist Bernhard Rupp in Innsbruck, to map out the chemical reactions. The results made it clear: although the pathways differ, the destination is the same.

In the words of Schäfer: “Here, nature has actually invented the same active compound twice.”

Beyond Curiosity: Implications for Medicine

While the ecological purpose of psilocybin remains mysterious, the discovery carries exciting implications for medicine and biotechnology. Psilocybin has gained renewed attention as a promising treatment for therapy-resistant depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Traditionally, producing psilocybin for research or pharmaceutical use has required either cultivating mushrooms or relying on complex chemical synthesis. But now, with knowledge of additional enzyme pathways, scientists have new tools for biotechnological production.

By harnessing these enzymes in microbial bioreactors, psilocybin could be produced more efficiently, sustainably, and at a scale suitable for widespread clinical use. This could accelerate the development of new mental health therapies and make them more accessible to patients worldwide.

The Broader Lesson: Nature’s Endless Creativity

Perhaps the most profound insight from this research is not just about psilocybin, but about the resourcefulness of life itself. Fungi, often overlooked in the natural world, have once again revealed their chemical genius. By evolving completely distinct molecular toolkits to solve the same problem, they remind us that biology is not linear but endlessly inventive.

For scientists, this discovery opens doors to new strategies in drug development and biotechnology. For philosophers and dreamers, it is a reminder of the deep mysteries still woven into the fabric of nature.

Psilocybin’s story is still unfolding—from ancient rituals to modern clinics, from ecological defense to convergent evolution. It is a molecule that has long bound humans and mushrooms together, and now, with this new discovery, it tells us something even larger: life finds many paths to the same truth.

More information: Dissimilar Reactions and Enzymes for Psilocybin Biosynthesis in Inocybe and Psilocybe Mushrooms, Angewandte Chemie International Edition (2025). DOI: 10.1002/anie.202512017

Looking For Something Else?