Editorial Guidelines

At Science News Today, we believe that science journalism should be as trustworthy and thoughtful as the discoveries it covers. Every story we publish is guided by one purpose: to bring science closer to people—with clarity, accuracy, and integrity.

We don’t just report the news. We translate complexity into meaning, data into understanding, and discovery into human stories. These editorial guidelines reflect the principles we live by—because in a world shaped by science, how we tell the story matters just as much as the story itself.

Truth Comes First

Our foundation is built on facts. Every article is carefully researched and thoroughly checked before it’s published. We rely on peer-reviewed journals, leading institutions, and subject-matter experts—not speculation, hype, or hearsay. If a story hasn’t been verified, it won’t be published.

Science evolves—and so do we. If new information comes to light or a detail needs correcting, we update the article promptly and transparently. Accuracy is not a one-time goal; it’s a continuous responsibility.

Transparent, Trusted Sources

We’re clear about where our information comes from. Whether it’s a landmark study, a NASA mission update, a university press release, or an interview with a climate researcher, we cite our sources openly and link to original materials whenever possible. We want our readers to explore deeper, not just take our word for it.

Anonymous sources are used rarely and only when absolutely necessary—for example, to protect whistleblowers or researchers facing risk. In those cases, we explain why anonymity was granted and how the information was verified.

Independence, Always

Science News Today is fiercely independent. Our editorial team chooses what we cover, how we cover it, and why it matters—without pressure from advertisers, sponsors, or outside influences. Our decisions are driven by science, public interest, and our journalistic values—not clicks or agendas.

When we partner with institutions or accept sponsorships for specific projects, those relationships are disclosed clearly. Our integrity is not negotiable.

No False Balance

We do not “balance” science with misinformation. If 99% of scientists agree on a conclusion and 1% disagree without credible evidence, we will not treat both views as equal. Our role is to represent the science accurately—not to create artificial controversy where none exists.

That said, we embrace the uncertainty that is part of science. We cover emerging research, legitimate debate, and areas where knowledge is still unfolding—always with context, caution, and care.

Science, Written for Humans

Science isn’t just equations and data—it’s a story about who we are, how we live, and where we’re going. That’s why we write in language that speaks to people, not textbooks. We strive to make science readable without dumbing it down, rich in meaning without overwhelming detail.

We want every reader—from high school students to researchers on their lunch break—to feel welcomed, informed, and inspired.

A Commitment to Representation

The world of science is global, diverse, and complex—and we aim to reflect that in every story we tell. We actively seek out underrepresented voices, report on research from across the world, and avoid bias in language and coverage. We believe science is stronger when it reflects the full spectrum of humanity.

Science News Today is more than just a place to read about science—it’s a platform built on trust, shaped by curiosity, and powered by people who believe in truth. These editorial principles aren’t just policies. They’re promises—to our readers, to the scientific community, and to the future we all share.

If you ever spot something we missed, have a question about our process, or simply want to know more about how we work, we welcome your voice. You can reach us anytime through our contact form — we read every message, and we take your feedback seriously.

Because science deserves good storytelling. And readers deserve to know they can trust it.