Human perception is a complex, layered phenomenon, shaped by a web of social, psychological, and cultural influences. At its core, how we view others is often informed by factors like age, gender, race, socioeconomic status, and more. For decades, researchers have studied how stereotypes and biases play out across these categories, especially in the context of age and gender. Traditionally, it has been assumed that older women occupy one of the most marginalized positions in society — caught in a so-called “double jeopardy” because they are both female and elderly. But a new, extensive meta-analysis published in Psychological Bulletin challenges this narrative and offers a far more nuanced understanding of how people perceive others based on both age and gender.
The study, conducted by Angela Shakeri and Michael S. North, aimed to settle an ongoing debate between two theories: the “double jeopardy” hypothesis and the “convergence” hypothesis. By synthesizing data from over 37,000 participants across nearly a hundred studies, the researchers provide one of the most comprehensive analyses of age-gender perceptions to date. Their findings not only reveal surprising trends but also shed light on the evolving nature of bias and its underlying mechanisms.
Understanding the Traditional View: What Is Double Jeopardy?
The “double jeopardy” hypothesis is rooted in intersectionality theory, which emphasizes how different axes of identity — such as age, gender, and race — intersect to produce unique forms of discrimination and disadvantage. For older women, this has historically meant facing a compound effect of societal bias: one part ageism and another part sexism.
This perspective suggests that older women are uniquely devalued. They are often thought to lose their physical attractiveness, reproductive relevance, and professional potential — all qualities that are unfairly and disproportionately tied to women’s worth in many cultures. These beliefs, embedded in media, advertising, workplace policies, and even healthcare, foster the idea that older women are not only invisible but actively undesirable.
Some empirical research over the years has supported this view. Older women have been shown to receive fewer job callbacks, are less likely to be portrayed in positive roles in media, and are often underrepresented in leadership positions. For decades, this “double jeopardy” framework has dominated discussions in both academic and advocacy circles. However, is this story still accurate today, in a world where gender roles are evolving and populations are aging rapidly?
A New Perspective: The Gender Convergence Hypothesis
Contrary to the double jeopardy argument, the “gender convergence” hypothesis posits that the social disadvantages associated with gender actually decrease as people age. In this view, aging levels the playing field. As women and men grow older, their perceived gender-based differences blur, leading to a more equal treatment in the eyes of others.
The convergence hypothesis stems from the idea that age becomes a more salient factor than gender in late life. Essentially, being old trumps being male or female in shaping societal attitudes. At older ages, societal focus shifts away from traits linked to traditional gender roles — such as physical attractiveness, sexual desirability, or dominance — and moves toward generalized age-based expectations like frailty, wisdom, or disengagement. In such a scenario, older men and older women may be judged more similarly.
This hypothesis has gained traction in recent years, particularly as life expectancy increases and older adults play a more active role in society. But until now, there has been little systematic research comparing these two ideas head-to-head. That’s where the work of Shakeri and North becomes groundbreaking.
How the Meta-Analysis Was Conducted
To compare the double jeopardy and convergence perspectives, the researchers conducted a rigorous meta-analysis — a method of statistically combining results from multiple studies to identify patterns across diverse datasets. They focused on research published after the year 2000 to ensure the data reflected contemporary social norms.
Their analysis included 55 independent studies drawn from academic journals, doctoral dissertations, and conference proceedings, which together comprised 92 unique samples and 37,235 participants. The studies measured attitudes toward people of different age and gender groups using various types of stimuli — including written vignettes, photographs, videos, audio recordings, and real-life encounters. Participants ranged from university students to broader community samples, giving the findings a broad base of applicability.
To qualify for inclusion, studies had to report on perceptions of at least two intersecting age-gender groups — for instance, younger women versus older men, or middle-aged women versus middle-aged men. Attitudes were measured across a wide range of domains, from stereotypes and emotional reactions to behavioral intentions like willingness to hire or interact with someone. This multi-dimensional approach allowed for a more sophisticated understanding of how people are perceived across life stages.
What the Findings Reveal About Women, Men, and Aging
Overall, the researchers found that people tend to view women more positively than men across most age groups. Specifically, younger and middle-aged women were seen more favorably than their male counterparts, especially in terms of warmth and likeability. These women were typically perceived as friendly, cooperative, emotionally intelligent, and socially desirable — attributes that are often highly valued in both personal and professional settings.
Interestingly, this trend shifted when participants evaluated older adults. Among individuals aged 55 and above, perceptions of men and women were nearly identical. There was no significant gender-based difference in how older adults were viewed, lending strong support to the convergence hypothesis. In other words, gender differences in societal attitudes tend to flatten with age.
However, this is not the whole story.
The data also revealed that while older women were not necessarily viewed more negatively than older men, they experienced a sharper decline in positivity compared to their younger selves. The drop in favorable attitudes from youth to old age was significantly steeper for women than for men. This finding supports the core idea of double jeopardy — that older women lose social capital more rapidly than others, even if they are not outright disliked or discriminated against more than older men.
Different Attitudes for Different Traits: Warmth vs. Competence
One of the most fascinating aspects of the meta-analysis was its exploration of how different dimensions of perception influenced overall attitudes. The researchers examined traits such as warmth, competence, agency (i.e., assertiveness and independence), and attractiveness. This breakdown provided a much more granular understanding of age-gender bias.
For example, older women were often perceived as warm and kind — qualities that aligned with traditional expectations of femininity and aging. However, when it came to competence and agency, they were rated less favorably than both older men and younger women. This dual perception suggests a kind of “benevolent ageism,” where older women are liked but not respected, appreciated for their nurturing roles but not considered capable or authoritative.
Meanwhile, younger women were seen as both warm and competent, enjoying a kind of “sweet spot” in terms of social perception. Middle-aged women maintained many of these positive traits, but older women experienced a decline in traits related to power, independence, and professional ability. Older men, by contrast, retained a greater share of their perceived competence, even as they aged.
Behavioral Intentions: Do People Act on These Attitudes?
It’s one thing to have stereotypes or general attitudes; it’s another to act on them. That’s why the meta-analysis also explored behavioral intentions — for instance, whether someone would be willing to hire, promote, or collaborate with an individual from a certain age-gender group.
Here, the convergence hypothesis gained additional support. Behavioral intentions toward older men and older women were more or less equal. In practical terms, this means that while people may think differently about older women and men (e.g., in terms of competence or attractiveness), they do not necessarily treat them differently in everyday behavior, at least in measurable ways.
This finding has significant implications for workplace dynamics, caregiving, policy-making, and social services. It suggests that while stereotypes persist, they may not always translate into discriminatory actions, especially when people are made aware of them or are operating within structured environments like hiring protocols.
Cultural Gaps: The Western-Centric Nature of the Data
As comprehensive as the meta-analysis is, it does have limitations. The vast majority of the studies included were conducted in Western countries, particularly in North America and Europe. As a result, the findings may not generalize to other cultural contexts, especially those with different gender norms, family structures, and views on aging.
In many Asian, African, or Latin American societies, older adults — particularly older women — may be accorded greater respect and authority within families and communities. In these cultures, age is often associated with wisdom, and elder women may serve as matriarchs, healers, or spiritual guides. Future research would do well to explore these dynamics and test whether the convergence and double jeopardy hypotheses hold up in more diverse settings.
Why These Findings Matter: Toward a More Inclusive Future
The study by Shakeri and North is not just an academic exercise. Its implications stretch across multiple domains of life, including employment, healthcare, education, media representation, and social policy. Understanding how age and gender intersect to shape perceptions can help us design fairer workplaces, more inclusive healthcare systems, and more accurate portrayals in media.
For example, knowing that older women are viewed as warm but not competent can inform strategies to combat ageism in hiring and promotion decisions. Awareness of the double jeopardy effect can help HR professionals develop better mentorship and retention programs for aging female employees. Similarly, educators and advocates can use these insights to challenge harmful stereotypes and promote more balanced, respectful representations of aging in public discourse.
Moreover, the notion of convergence offers a note of optimism. It suggests that society is capable of moving beyond traditional gender roles and that age may, in some ways, offer liberation from certain biases. If these trends continue, we may one day live in a world where being older — regardless of gender — is associated not with decline, but with experience, wisdom, and continued relevance.
Conclusion: A Complex but Hopeful Picture
In the end, the story told by this landmark meta-analysis is one of complexity. Age and gender do not operate in isolation; they intersect in ways that can amplify or diminish social biases depending on the context, trait, and behavior in question. While the double jeopardy of being an older woman still exists in some respects, the idea of gender convergence offers a powerful counter-narrative — one that sees aging as a great equalizer rather than a social death sentence.
The key takeaway is that stereotypes are not destiny. They can be understood, challenged, and changed. And by digging deeper into how we perceive others — not just at face value, but across dimensions like warmth, competence, and agency — we take an important step toward building a society that respects and values all its members, regardless of age or gender.
Love this? Share it and help us spark curiosity about science!
