Science News Today
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Astronomy
  • Health and Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Earth Sciences
  • Archaeology
  • Technology
Science News Today
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Astronomy
  • Health and Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Earth Sciences
  • Archaeology
  • Technology
No Result
View All Result
Science News Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Astronomy

What If We Find Nothing? The Surprising Power of a Cosmic No-Show in the Search for Alien Life

by Muhammad Tuhin
April 8, 2025
The first Earth-size planet orbiting a star in the "habitable zone"—the range of distance from a star where liquid water might pool on the surface of an orbiting planet. Credit: NASA Ames/SETI Institute/JPL-Caltech

The first Earth-size planet orbiting a star in the "habitable zone"—the range of distance from a star where liquid water might pool on the surface of an orbiting planet. Credit: NASA Ames/SETI Institute/JPL-Caltech

0
SHARES

Imagine the day humanity finally scans dozens of Earth-like planets for signs of life—and comes up completely empty. Not a single whiff of oxygen, no trace of methane, and not even the faintest whisper of a biosignature in the swirling clouds of distant worlds. Would that mean we are truly alone in the universe?

You might also like

Venus Clouds May Hide Alien Life Waiting to Be Found

The Hidden Third Stars That Forge Explosive Stellar Love Stories

When a Cosmic Lighthouse Grows Quiet Blazar S5 0716+714 Surprises Astronomers

Not necessarily—but it would be a profound scientific discovery in its own right.

A team of researchers led by Dr. Daniel Angerhausen, a physicist in Professor Sascha Quanz’s Exoplanets and Habitability Group at ETH Zurich, and an affiliate of the SETI Institute, recently turned this sobering question into an opportunity. Their study, published in The Astronomical Journal, explores a seemingly paradoxical idea: how not finding alien life could still teach us a great deal about how common life really is in the cosmos.

And surprisingly, the absence of evidence—if interpreted carefully—can speak volumes.

A New Kind of Cosmic Census

The team’s work was conducted under the framework of the Swiss National Center of Competence in Research, PlanetS. It focuses on how we could use future astronomical surveys—like the upcoming LIFE (Large Interferometer for Exoplanets) mission—to get statistically meaningful answers, even if they don’t detect a single sign of extraterrestrial life.

Their tool of choice? Bayesian statistics. A method rooted in probability theory, Bayesian analysis allows scientists to combine prior knowledge with new data to make informed conclusions, even when the evidence seems elusive.

The question the researchers asked was simple but powerful: How many planets would we need to examine to meaningfully say something about how often life occurs—if we find nothing at all?

The answer: If we observed between 40 to 80 Earth-like exoplanets and found no signs of life, we could statistically conclude that fewer than 10 to 20 percent of such planets likely host life.

And when scaled up to the estimated number of rocky, potentially habitable planets in the Milky Way, that “mere” 10 percent still represents up to 10 billion possible living worlds.

So even a cosmic silence, it turns out, might still echo with tantalizing implications.

The Devil’s in the (Uncertain) Details

But hold your warp drives—there’s a catch. Every exoplanet observation comes with uncertainty, and in the search for life, those uncertainties can be mission-critical.

Two types of uncertainty complicate matters: interpretation uncertainty and sample uncertainty.

Interpretation uncertainty deals with false negatives—in other words, what if life is there, but we simply fail to detect it? Perhaps a planet harbors microbes that don’t produce recognizable biosignatures, or perhaps our instruments just aren’t sensitive enough to catch the subtle signs.

Sample uncertainty, on the other hand, reflects the danger of cherry-picking bad examples. If our target planets don’t actually meet the environmental criteria needed to support life—such as the presence of liquid water or a stable atmosphere—then our survey might be statistically biased from the outset.

As Dr. Angerhausen warns, “It’s not just about how many planets we observe—it’s about asking the right questions and how confident we can be in seeing or not seeing what we’re searching for. If we’re not careful and are overconfident in our abilities to identify life, even a large survey could lead to misleading results.”

The LIFE Mission: Peering Into Alien Atmospheres

These questions are especially relevant in light of the LIFE mission, which is being led by ETH Zurich. LIFE’s goal is to use advanced space telescopes to peer into the atmospheres of dozens of exoplanets that are similar in mass, size, and temperature to Earth.

By analyzing their atmospheric composition—looking for water vapor, oxygen, carbon dioxide, methane, and other biosignatures—scientists hope to detect the chemical fingerprints of life.

If LIFE finds signs of life, it could spark a revolution in science and philosophy alike. But if it doesn’t, then thanks to studies like Angerhausen’s, that too will offer invaluable knowledge. A null result, carefully interpreted, could help place meaningful constraints on just how often life emerges in the universe.

Framing the Right Questions for a Cosmic Survey

To minimize uncertainty and make their conclusions as bulletproof as possible, the researchers advocate for asking specific, measurable questions instead of vague ones. For example, rather than asking, “How many planets have life?”—a question that’s impossible to answer directly—they suggest questions like:

“What fraction of rocky exoplanets in the habitable zone show clear signs of water vapor, oxygen, or methane?”

These questions are not only easier to tackle with current technology, but they also yield data that’s more amenable to robust statistical analysis.

This approach ensures that even in the face of ambiguity, our scientific interpretations stay grounded, precise, and—most importantly—testable.

Bayesian vs. Frequentist: A Statistical Showdown

Another highlight of the study is its dual approach to data interpretation. Alongside Bayesian methods, the researchers also employed a Frequentist framework—a classical statistical method that avoids assumptions about prior knowledge.

Emily Garvin, a co-author of the paper and a Ph.D. student in Quanz’s group, led the Frequentist analysis. “In applied science,” she notes, “Bayesian and Frequentist statistics are sometimes interpreted as two competing schools of thought. As a statistician, I like to treat them as alternative and complementary ways to understand the world and interpret probabilities.”

Her work helped verify the robustness of the team’s assumptions and provided a check against any biases that may have crept in through the Bayesian priors.

The takeaway? When handled carefully, both methods arrive at comparable results—at least for the kind of sample sizes expected in upcoming missions like LIFE.

What We Stand to Gain from Nothing

So what happens if LIFE and other future missions scour the skies and come up short?

Far from being a disappointment, such a result could mark a turning point in our understanding of our place in the universe. It would allow scientists to narrow the possible frequency of life-bearing worlds. It would refine our models of planetary formation and atmospheric chemistry. And it would deepen the mystery of why, in a galaxy teeming with planets, Earth seems to stand alone.

Or perhaps, we’ve simply not looked far enough—or deep enough.

“One single positive detection would change everything,” says Angerhausen. “But even if we don’t find life, we’ll be able to quantify how rare—or common—planets with detectable biosignatures really might be.”

And that’s the real beauty of science. Even silence has something to say.

Reference: What if We Find Nothing? Bayesian Analysis of the Statistical Information of Null Results in Future Exoplanet Habitability and Biosignature Surveys, The Astronomical Journal (2025). DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/adb96d

TweetShareSharePinShare

Recommended For You

An artist's impression of the proposed VERVE mission to Venus the answer whether tiny bacterial lifeforms really do exist in the planet's clouds. Credit: Danielle Futselaar
Astronomy

Venus Clouds May Hide Alien Life Waiting to Be Found

July 9, 2025
This artwork depicts a triple-star system in which two of the stars are locked in a tight gravitational orbit. The bright star in the foreground on the right is a white dwarf, which is stealing mass from its stellar companion. Eventually, this building up of mass on the white dwarf will trigger periodic explosions. Together, the two stars form an object called cataclysmic variable. Credit: Caltech/R. Hurt (IPAC)
Astronomy

The Hidden Third Stars That Forge Explosive Stellar Love Stories

July 9, 2025
Upper panel: Weekly binned gamma-ray light curve of S5 0716+714. Bottom panel: combined long-term V-band light curve. Credit: Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2025). DOI: 10.1093/mnras/staf1019
Astronomy

When a Cosmic Lighthouse Grows Quiet Blazar S5 0716+714 Surprises Astronomers

July 9, 2025
The newly discovered exoplanet HD 135344 Ab can be seen as a yellow dot on the right side of the image. It was measured in 2019 (2x), 2021, and 2022. The empty purple circle with the star in the middle indicates the location of the corresponding star. This star was filtered out, first by a coronograph and further by digital post-processing. The dashed line represents the planet's orbit. Credit: Stolker et al.
Astronomy

Hidden Giant Found Orbiting a Star That Should Have Stopped Making Planets

July 9, 2025
Total solar eclipse as viewed from Earth in 2023. Credit: Miloslav Druckmuller, Shadia Habbal, Pavel Starha
Astronomy

A Tiny Satellite Plans to Chase Eternal Eclipses to Unlock the Sun’s Secrets

July 9, 2025
An artist's impression of the UK-led CosmoCube spacecraft, which would orbit be tasked with listening out for an "ancient whisper" from the early universe on the far side of the moon. Credit: Nicolo Bernardini (SSTL Ltd) & Kaan Artuc (University of Cambridge)
Astronomy

Scientists Are Sending a Spacecraft to Listen to the Whisper of the Early Universe

July 9, 2025
These images, showing ejecta around the impacted near-Earth asteroids, were taken during the approach (with Didymos to the upper left) and departure (Didymos to the upper right) of DART's companion spacecraft, LICIACube, which flew past a few minutes after the impact and imaged the aftermath. The ejecta field consists of an asymmetric cone of dust that exhibits streamers and filaments, as well as over a hundred meter-sized boulders that were ejected in preferred directions. Credit: NASA DART team and LICIACube.
Astronomy

NASA’s Asteroid Strike Unleashes a Surprise Storm of Space Boulders

July 9, 2025
Images of the sample obtained using a scanning electron microscope. These are backscattered electron images, and the different shades of grey highlight different chemical compositions of the minerals making up the rock. Credit: University of Manchester
Astronomy

Moon Rock Found in Africa Unlocks Secrets of Lost Lunar Volcanoes

July 9, 2025
This artist's illustration shows the Giant Impact that created the moon. When the protoplanet Theia struck Earth more than 4 billion years ago, it may have delivered important chemicals to Earth that enabled life to appear. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/T. Pyle
Astronomy

The Cosmic Chaos That Made Earth the Only Habitable Planet

July 8, 2025
Next Post
This image shows the Earth’s Critical Zone, which extends from the tops of trees down through the soil to depths up to 700 feet and depicts the microbes which live throughout this zone. This zone supports most life on the planet as it regulates essential processes like soil formation, water cycling and nutrient cycling, which are vital for food production, water quality and ecosystem health. Credit: Michigan State University

Scientists Discover New Microbial Phylum That Helps Purify Earth’s Water

The Blue-faced Honeyeater (Entomyzon cyanotis) successfully colonized urban areas in Australia. Like many urban-dwelling bird species, it is characterized by conspicuous plumage colouration. Credit: MPI for Biological Intelligence / Kaspar Delhey

City Lights and Colorful Feathers: How Urban Life is Painting Birds in Brighter Shades

What is a Blockchain Wallet? The Ultimate Guide for Beginners

Legal

  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Disclaimer
  • Editorial Guidelines
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions

© 2025 Science News Today. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Astronomy
  • Health and Medicine
  • Psychology
  • Earth Sciences
  • Archaeology
  • Technology

© 2025 Science News Today. All rights reserved.

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.